
The only time I disagreed with Paglia was when she said that “In the beginning was nature.” From a Christian standpoint according to the Bible in the beginning was the word. God’s words are what brought about nature from my point of view. What I liked about the article was when words were shown of the foods eaten. For me, there was a chain reaction. I saw the word on the paper, then saw it in my head, and afterwards started to salivate because I could taste the image in my mouth. If I had not known what the foods looked like visually there would probably not have been a response to the words. I agreed for the most part with what Paglia had to say because of that fact. However, I do believe that they agreed on many topics and Postman had a lot to say.
2 comments:
This cleared up the religion aspect of the argument a lot for me, seeing as how I had no clue what they were talking about while I was reading in the book.
i dont understand how religion became a part of the argument, it believe that Paglia was trying to skew the issue
Post a Comment